Flag test event

Where:

Redefining Value

The following are the results of the GAP at the Degrowth Conference 2010 in Barcelona that are particularly relevant for this working group

The document presents the complete results of those Barcelona working groups with some relations the current one


Working Groups from 2010 GAP in Barcelona with some connections:


Human nature and degrowth

  • Human beings have biological, emotional, intellectual and spiritual potentials, and different cultures realize them differently. The social, political and economic conditions which people live in shape their values and behaviors.

  • Humans seem to tend to act ‘short-term’, but now with humankind facing pressing ecological limits, there is now a need to create institutions fostering us to feel, think and act more long-term (i.e. within ecological limits).

  • In the context of degrowth, it is imperative to draw upon and integrate research including but not limited to anthropology, happiness studies, experimental economics, evolutionary psychology, and neuroscience for transcending the concept of homo economicus. Such research into human nature would enable us to better understand how to reshape these conditions in order to favor those values and behaviors which are socially and environmentally benign - for example to better distinguish between real needs and illusory needs/satisfiers.

  • We propose to support existing and creating new experimental spaces, i.e. communities experimenting with degrowth at a local scale to investigate in practice how best to satisfy the basic needs for sharing, creating and mutual esteeming.


How to deal with advertising

  • Advertising increases consumption by creating the illusion that people can satisfy their needs – real or imaginary - through products. It is wasteful and is driven by the competitive nature of the capitalist system.

  • To deal with advertising, we need a bottom-up and a top-down approach. Bottom-up focusses on changing people’s perception of advertising to recognise its manipulative nature. Top-down refers to government action to impose limits. More research is needed on freeing communications channels from advertising.

Bottom-up proposals:

  • Empower people to enable them to deconstruct advertising

  • Detox from the imagery of the consumption society

  • Community child protection from advertising

  • Debunking the myth of satisfying immaterial needs with material goods

  • Reduce inequality – inequality drives consumerism

  • Expose ubiquity of advertising

  • Expose exploitation of values in advertising

  • Direct action, ie subvertising

Top-down proposals:

  • Ban everything (all ads) possible from public space

  • Regulate everything (all ads) possible that affect kids/vulnerable people, health, CO2-intensive sectors, sexist messages, etc.

  • Advertising should be as expensive as possible, i.e. taxes, accounting standards, etc.

Research questions:

  • Do we need ombudsmen for advertising?

  • How to free the internet from advertising?

  • How to organise free communications financially? (i.e. What are the real costs of a newspaper?)


Political strategies

Three comprehensive and complementary options:

  • Exit strategy: leaving the system, building alternatives

  • Voice strategy: political movement and activist, a particular engagement

  • Loyalty strategy: change within the political system, assimilation within the political party system, perhaps too early and perhaps against the ideas of degrowth

Further points:

  • Need to learn from other local initiatives, some cases were discussed, and the need to be based more in the grassroots and history of movements, have relevance recognize diversity of socio-cultural and political history contexts

  • Need to learn to local initiatives to reply in other local contexts or to extract models that can be expanded at the global level. Degrowth is not an entirely new idea, to take root in the 1970´s, is important to learn about mistakes, need to highlight alternatives of the past and look at how they have worked.

  • The discussion have emphasis in understand social, technological, political and economics contexts that made differences between now and 70´s. The movements change from our current situation and position at local and global level should not be only one, but would have to be constructed from an understanding of the different cultures and political history context in determining the emphasis on particular political strategies.


Indicators for degrowth

Goal of the Indicators: reduce resource use on one hand as well as wastes and emissions to within ecological limits while maintaining and enhancing quality of life

What to measure:

  • environmental as well as social indicators (with economic ones part of the latter)

  • qualitative and quantitative aspects

  • objective and subjective indicators

What to consider:

  • bottom-up and deliberative approach

  • indicators for communication and indicators for analysis

  • consumption and production aspects

  • not to reinvent the wheel but make use of available (SD) indicators where appropirate

  • not get dominated what is measured already but consider first what to measure

Where:
Where:

Learning for Life: participation in the transformation of a common

Claudia Gómez-Portugal


To build and nurture sustainable communities:

One of today’s most important challenges is to build and nurture sustainable communities. Current environmental, social and existential crises, among others, increasingly lay bare the unsustainability of the global development model. In order to face this systemic crisis we have to recognize the need to create new structures and forms of organization that integrate learning processes into all our life dynamics and contribute to the paradigm shift from being predators of life to being sustainers of life. Today, free learning and education for life are key elements to progress toward knowledge societies that are able to effect coherent changes according to diverse contexts and needs, and achieve a sustainable present in which we are can recognize and regenerate existing connections and relationships with the earth, society and our inner being more harmoniously. 


Building new structures and organizational forms that integrate a type of learning that is centered on regeneration of life is fundamental. Beyond the concept of sustainability, recognizing our interconnectedness involves the construction of sustainable communities and knowledge about how we sustain such communities and life in community —starting from working in particular contexts and between peers. We urgently need to learn how to be community, and being community learn how to sustain life, as entities who are part of it.


We are an organization that currently devotes much of our efforts to building and nurturing the initiative "Free Learning Communities for Life”.The initiative seeks to create propitious contexts of learning in form or a commons —for both children and adults— around the reflection and action on recovering the possibility to learn and live on this planet. It takes up the approach of education for life that focuses on the need to understand how life is sustained and how we take part in this sustaining process based on the multiple and varied ways in which we live—thereby recognizing ourselves, in relation to and in cooperation with others and with nature. As Satish Kumar states, we cannot live apart, we need each other. The journey of education is to learn how to work together as the great challenge facing humanity.


What we are doing:

Learning for Life is a new work line for us that has become essential both for our organizational proposal and for our innovation of strategies for the commons —learning, communication and knowledge as a condition for change. We work with families, local actors, persons interested in deep ecology and free thinkers through three dimensions: action, dialogue and reflection, and build community. For the first, we organize lifelong learning practices focused on two actions: creating community orchards and discovering life in the region (bioregionalism).


For the second, we are generating a discursive proposal through the dialogue with different activists, thinkers, initiatives and organizations related to free learning, alternative to education and the commons paradigm. We organize cinema debates with kids and parents, about the related topics, and we are about to start exchange reflection sessions between people from the learning communities in three regions (Tepoztlan-Morelos, Mexico City and Cuautitlan Izcalli-State of Mexico) together with the Universidad de la Tierra in Oaxaca.


Finally, in the dimension of building community, we have created a learning community in Mexico City and we are setting up a second one at Tepoztlan-Morelos. So far we have organized two encounters of "Free Learning and Education for Life" in which we have started our own orchard. These encounters are meetings to exchanging ideas and knowledge on how to care for the interest and desire to learn, how to offer to both ourselves and our children the possibility to learn in freedom and dignity, how to encourage new forms of conviviality and solidarity organization, how to cultivate joy of life and how to relate to life differently.


Sakbe Commons for Social Change focuses its efforts on the reclaiming and regenerating the commons and on building sustainable communities. We work on the agenda for social change around local empowerment, collective construction, free learning and effective participation. Since 2007 we have collaborated with institutions, civil and social organizations, local communities and indigenous groups in order to improve the quality of life and to strengthen democratic participation in environmental and social issues related to post-development, climate change agendas and emerging public policy.


We start from the premise that information, transparency, access to information and communication technologies, participation based on the analysis and collective construction are factors that are closely related to the ability of people to make changes and build new conditions and contexts. We assume that many of the changes that must occur in societies emerge from recovering the organization of life through knowledge sharing, networking and alliances with common goals. And we believe that one of the key moments in any process of change occurs when different groups develop proposals and set spaces for reflection, decision making and action that allow them to improve their living conditions.


Learning and living:

How can we reclaim the possibility to learn and to live on this planet? And in this sense, how can we live and work with a greater purpose? The way we learn is closely linked with how we live. We learn while we live and we decide how to live on the basis of our learning; if there is lack of genuine learning we no longer choose how to live. If we want to release learning we have to reclaim the possibility to learn —which requires learning to be integrated into every aspect of life. 


In order to boost for a paradigm shift, learning has to be understood as a common, recognizing that education is constantly evolving into a learning by doing of a society as a collective and living entity that continuously generates new learnings, ideas and knowledge through the exchange of interests, motivations and needs. Current education systems —although they are meant to teach about life and work— are set outside of a real environment, and are based on curricula that are largely the same whether for a small village or a major world city. This homogenity separates education from the flow of life and limits a real learning that responds to genuine interests and required changes.


Real learning cannot be understood in disconnection from life; free learning is the learning of life. Recovering the possibility of how to live is intertwined with a holistic approach to life, assuming that we are all connected and participante in the weave of life. In this sense, the Free Learning Communities for Life initiative seeks to integrate free learning into family life and into a community environment on the basis of the regeneration of life, starting from the premise that no change will be possible unless we take responsibility for our own dynamics in every aspect of our lives. Its conformation arises as a participative process of free learning, based on the meeting and exchange of ideas and the creation of new knowledge.


Systemic proposal: 

What do we mean by sustainability of life, and what are the new structures, forms of organization and new commons that are required? How can a new organization help establish a more harmonious relationship with life? How can we face up to educational and non-education systems that are dissociated from the web of life and promote competitiveness and individualism in direct contrast to collaboration and cooperation in networks?


For Fritjof Capra, the basic pattern of life is the network by which all relationships and connections are supported in continuous collaboration. He points out that ecosystems are living networks of organisms; that organisms are networks of cells, organs and systems; that cells are networks of molecules; and that wherever we see life, we see networks. Capra suggests that living networks in human societies are networks of communications which, like biological networks, are self-generating. Each communication creates thoughts and meaning which give rise to further communications, and thus the entire network generates itself. 

Learning is an active element of society. When the integration and participation of a large number of people is involved, it is capable of generating new knowledge; and as communities participating in knowledge or knowledge societies, it is capable of generating the required change from these contexts and its own needs in the face of the major challenges of today. UNESCO recognizes that emerging societies will have to be societies in which knowledge be shared in order to remain conducive to human and life development: “A knowledge society must ensure the sharing of knowledge as a common good, and must be able to integrate each of its members and promote new forms of solidarity with the present and future generations”.

The conformation of Free Learning Communities for Life seeks to prove that the initial exercise of sustainability is based on the creation of small learning communities centered on a holistic vision; that the construction of the community itself is an initial learning process to regenerate life; that recovering this possibility — as we grow and learn in relation to others — is the beginning of a new common structure that can contribute to the conformation of an education for life. Friendship is the starting point for the sustainability of life and the generation of new structures; it is an engine of interconnection and generation of networks; it is the first step in any undertaking or project. Like the network, it is the pattern through which we move beyond individualism, indifference and the state of anomie.

Where:

Dear GAPers,

here are some scientific sessions, panels and workshops, linking to our GAP. Please try to visit some of them, so that we have a good exchange with the debates on the conference, bringing syntheses and questions from related workshops to the GAP, as well as bringing our discussions to the workshops and sessions. Feel free to add some more.

Some are in German, many in english. Would be great if you can already post, where you definitly plan to go

Children

Why degrowth begins with keeping children out of institutions

Children and degrowth - relationship as social duty

How children learn in Buen Vivir

Child-friendly City Rally ( with Silvia Hable)

Early childhood care from a growth-critical perspective ( with Silvia Hable)

Psycho-dynamics of power and consumption

Splitting up in girls and boys - an economic model of success

Learning/Education

Dimensions of learning for a degrowth society

Bottom up transformation: Grassroots, practices, and communities

Unlearning old habits: New practices and experiences for degrowth

(with Christiane Richard- Elsner)

What could a convivial organisation look like? The Otherwise Club

What Ego can learn from the self? (Independent learning) - Guided tour through exhibition

Café kaput - a repair café and education project

Democratic education - Schools with human beings

Educational tour in the West of Leipzig

Education for Sustainable Development in Saxony and Leipzig

Following Ivan Illich - Education in a convivial society

Visions, values & well-being

Teaching degrowth: Lessons learned

Schooling the world, Lost people: Film presentation and discussion

Urban Planning

Design, agriculture & cities

Less is more (space) - changing regions in Japan and Germany

Post-industrial quarters in Leipzig’s west as a realm of local economy - a cultural heritage that should be protected? Bike tour

Shrinking cities and space in post-growth scocieties

City of the future - Degrowth thought through

Child-friendly City Rally

(Care) Work

Degrowth economy: What does this mean with regard to concepts of work?

Economy of Liberation, Solidarity Economy and Good Living (bem-viver)

Beyond development and resource extractivism: Feminist perpectives

Care, ecological and social aspects of reproduction

(Re)Productivity as an economic paradigm for a social-ecological economy

Work on your self-production: start a social transformation

Following Ivan Illich - Acting in a convivial society

Where:

You can use this as an draft for your course invitation.

You must be logged in and be a registered participant of the Degrowth conference to be able to register to this working group.